HAMDAN V. RUMSFELD

(b)(1 Tep_eseisepproved for Release. 2016/06/10 C06541720 ?, r (U) Hamdan v. Rumsfeld (b)(1) (b)(3) NatSecAct (b)(5) (b)(3) CIAAct (b)(3) NatSecAct (b)(1) (b)(3) NatSecAct Approved for Release: 2016/06/10 C06541720 i ([11(11 ? Tep--99eRmApproved for Release: 2016/06/10 C06541720gDwiym Ilcas_.,,,r,,,,. I ---- (b)(5) 2 (b)(1) (b)(3) NatSecAct Approved for Release: 2016/06/10 C06541720 (b)(1) Approved for Release: 2016/06/10 C06541720 TOP SECREly_ LfrIffePORIIR (b)(1) (b)(3) NatSecAct (b)(5) (b)(1) (b)(3) NatSecAct(/ (b)(1) (b)(3) NatSecAct Implications for Our Current Detention Program (b)(1) (b)(3) NatSecAct (b)(5) The impact of this holding on current CIA interrogation - practices could be significant. Steve Bradbury's preliminary view is that the opinion "calls into ref question" whether CIA could continue its CT interrogation program involving enhanced interrogation techniques. According to Bradbury, many, if not all, of CIA's enhanced interrogation techniques (including the seven techniques that would comprise the new, downsized Err program) could be construed as inconsistent with the 3 (b)(1) (b)(3) NatSecAct Approved for Release: 2016/06/10 C06541720  (b)(1) veix_seemio,Tproved for Release: 2016/06/10 C0615,4_112,AN.0 //mR k--,k-, - - 4 I. provisions of Common Article 3 prohibiting "outrages upon personal dignity" and "violence to life and person." (b)(1) (b)(3) NatSecAct (b)(5) 4 (b)(1) (b)(3) NatSecAct Approved for Release: 2016/06/10 C06541720